Not knowing just exactly what I was for, I found it more direct early in my scholarly life, to be against some ideas, some thinkersâ€¦to sense and test who I was not, what I would not do, and where the edges of my ideas or focus reside.
I argued vehemently, strongly, perhaps harshly against what I thought was wrong, was untruthful. I was a critic writing polemics; trying as well to explore new paths which had no particular history, no negatives.
Now, I occasionally discover that much of the thinking I call my own, is directedâ€¦ against, opposed. So much so, I sometimes think (and am told), that I do not say what I think is correct, except in the terms of some opposition, some polemic.
I wonder if I am anyone, in these times, except some enemy’s enemy, defined less byÂ personal integrity or by my friends with whom I think, but more by the ideas which I oppose. Where is truth located within these forms of disagreement and battles?
Who am I, positively, on the side of some ideas or thoughts; more than the armored battler always arguing against ideas or thoughts of others?