“What scientists do when a paradigm fails is, guess what, they carry on as if nothing happened.”
After watching this TED video of Elaine Morgan, updating us about the latest evolutionary research supporting the hypothesis that we evolved from primate ancestors who dwelt in watery habitats and the connection between nakedness and water in mamals, I thought I’d share my unedited essay on Elaine’s other examined ideas about m/other-child interaction from her book “The Descent of the Child: Human Evolution From a New Perspective“. Many paradigms need updating these days!
So, first the TED video updating on how we evolved, followed by my essay updating how we become somebody (interested folks might also like to see my (shorter) post about this.)
Seeing Somebody There
The broader context of this essay explores the fact that we humans are socially interactive creatures: â€œbodies-in-interaction.â€ Our individuality, the development of the self and/or the I, is an â€œemergentâ€ aspect of the human condition.
Fact is italicized since the history and current thinking about the human and how we are, think, knowâ€¦has managed to omit this fact. Why so, and what differences it makes in how we think about the human, the worldâ€¦are at the heart of this discussion.
The human has been characterized as each (physical) individual, essentially separate or independent of others â€“ at least early on in life. The individual has been characterized in terms of knowledge or mind: the individual is taken to be an embodied mind. The mind – how we know or have knowledge – is the factor of our being which is raised to the status of definition of our being.
In my experience, thought, and observations, this is not an accurate characterization of the human. Though it has been the completely dominant idea of the human â€“ particularly in Western thinking â€“ it leads us away from the experience and truth of our being â€“ tends to focus on certain of our (presumed) abilities as definitional â€“ and mis- or under-estimates many others. The facts of our faces being central to our being, for example, has been hardly studied or much considered in thinking about what is the human.